RABIU V STATE (1980) 1 LRLR Vol 1 Page 128

RABIU V STATE
Citation
(1980)
1 LRLR Vol 1 Page 128 (Reprint)
Alternative
Citation
(1980) 8-11 S.C. 130
The Appellant was
discharged and acquitted at the end of his trial, in the State High court, on a
criminal charge of culpable homicide (punishable with death) of his wife,
Hajiya Fati Mohammadu Nafiu, on the 10th day of May, 1979.
On appeal, the Federal
Court of Appeal dismissed the judgment of the High Court of Kano State and
convicted the Appellant of an offence of culpable homicide (not punishable with
death).
The Appellant (respondent
in the Court of Appeal) dissatisfied with the decision appealed to the Supreme
Court on the substantial question of law, that under the provisions of Sections
220 and 222 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979, the
Federal Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal against the
order of acquittal entered in his favor by the High Court, having regard to
the meaning of the term "decision" as defined in Section 277 of the
Constitution. He contended that the Federal Court of Appeal was wrong in law,
to have entertained the appeal at all whereas it should have dismissed it.
The Supreme
Court in dismissing the appeal stated that; in interpreting the Constitution, mere technical rules of interpretation
are to some extent inadmissible in a way so as to defeat the principles of
government enshrined in the Constitution.
Where
the question is whether the Constitution has used an expression in the wider or
in the narrower sense, the Court should always lean where the justice of the
case so demands to the broader interpretation unless there is something in the
context or in the rest of the Constitution to indicate that the narrower
interpretation will best carry out its object and purpose.
The Court rejected the Appellant’s
contention that an order of acquittal made by the High Court in criminal proceedings
does not come within the term 'decision' in Section 277 (1) of the
Constitution.
The judgment and
sentence of the Court of Appeal was therefore affirmed.
This principle has been applied in cases such as DIAPIALONG V DARIYE 2007,
FAWEHINMI V IGP (2002) 7 NWLR (PART 676) 606. GONI V.GAMBO (2002) FWLR (PT.
131) 1877 @1884-5, DIRECTOR OF SSS V. AGBAKOBA (1999)3 SC @77, SAVANNAH BANK (NIG.) LTD. V AJILO (1989) 1 NWLR
(PT.97)
Follow @LawRepositoryNG
Post a Comment